My basis for the article is that collectively we rally around the collective belief in community. That it’s impossible to maintain cohesiveness above 150 connections, that to do so we invent ‘myths’ that we can rally around.
Unsure of the agenda pertaining to being amoral – there’s certainly no allusion to such here, nor any leaning toward anything other than intrigue.
But your desire to reply is awesome. Appreciate your contribution to the extension of learning that I extol